Good adviser team
No family office. You use a solicitor, accountant or tax adviser, financial adviser or investment manager and perhaps a private bank.
- Lowest complexity.
- You coordinate much of it yourself.
- Very sensible for many £1m–£10m+ winners.
If you have just won £5 million, £25 million or £100 million, the words family office can make it sound as though you now need a boardroom full of people in suits.
You probably do not. What you may need, as the numbers get bigger and life gets more complicated, is one organised system that stops your solicitor, accountant, investment adviser, bank, properties, family gifts and household spending all becoming separate jobs for you to manage.
Imagine you win £50 million. You now have a solicitor dealing with your will, an accountant watching tax, an investment manager looking after the portfolio, a private bank, two properties, family members you want to help and perhaps staff at home.
Without coordination, you become the person in the middle of all of them.
A family office puts somebody else in charge of keeping that picture joined up. You still make the important decisions. The office makes sure the right people know what they need to know, paperwork is tracked and things actually get done.
This is where the idea becomes easier to understand. It deals with the boring, complicated bits around the exciting life.
The right people can check cash availability, ownership, tax, insurance, security and the wider plan before the money moves.
Legal and tax advisers can look at how to do it before an emotional promise becomes a permanent arrangement.
You do not have to decide whether it is brilliant or nonsense. It goes through an agreed checking process.
You should not have to spend a weekend finding statements from five banks and managers. The records are already organised.
You can have a clear policy for gifts and loans rather than deciding every request in the moment.
Insurance, property bills, payroll and financial administration can carry on without your holiday becoming an admin department.
These terms often get bundled together, but they do different jobs.
| Term | What it is | How it may fit after a win |
|---|---|---|
| Family office | People and systems coordinating the family's wealth and affairs. | Organises advisers, reporting, family decisions, property and administration. |
| Private bank | A banking service for wealthier clients. | Can help with banking, lending, large payments and sometimes investments. |
| Wealth manager | A firm or adviser mainly focused on financial planning and investments. | May manage part of the fortune without running the wider family administration. |
| Trust | A legal arrangement where trustees hold assets for beneficiaries. | Can serve specific family or estate goals but has separate tax and legal rules. |
| Family investment company | A company that can hold family investments. | May be considered for succession planning but is still a company with tax rules. |
Most winners who ever need family-office help will sit somewhere in the middle.
No family office. You use a solicitor, accountant or tax adviser, financial adviser or investment manager and perhaps a private bank.
One lead person or firm keeps the overall picture together while specialists remain external.
One professional organisation provides family-office services to several wealthy families.
A dedicated organisation working only for your family, potentially with its own finance, investment and administration staff.
There is no official threshold. These are practical guide ranges for a UK lottery winner, not rules. The amount left to manage after property, gifts and spending matters more than the original jackpot.
| Approximate win | What most winners are likely to need | What could move you up a level |
|---|---|---|
| £1m–£5m | Usually no family office. Good financial, legal and tax support where needed. | Complex business ownership, cross-border issues or difficult family/legal circumstances. |
| £5m–£15m | Still normally no dedicated office. A coordinated private-client team is usually enough. | Several children, major gifting, multiple properties, household staff or public exposure. |
| £15m–£30m | A virtual family-office style arrangement starts becoming useful for some families. | Trusts, businesses, philanthropy, property portfolios or heavy administration. |
| £30m–£75m | Virtual or multi-family office becomes a credible option. | Consolidated reporting, a gatekeeper, staff, businesses or several advisers. |
| £75m–£150m | Serious family-office support is increasingly reasonable, but a full private office is not automatic. | Multiple family branches, direct investing, cross-border assets, philanthropy or intense privacy needs. |
| £150m+ | A single-family office becomes a realistic option if much of the wealth remains investable and complexity justifies it. | A simple family may still prefer a multi-family or outsourced model. |
These examples show why the jackpot is only the starting point.
They pay the mortgage, replace the cars, help parents and invest the rest.
Likely answer: no family office. A good adviser, solicitor when needed and tax/accounting support should be enough.
They spend £2.5m initially and want to help siblings and parents without every family event becoming a money meeting.
Likely answer: still no full office. A coordinated adviser team plus a clear gifting policy may be plenty.
There are investments, family gifts, insurance, property costs, privacy questions and requests for help.
Likely answer: a virtual or multi-family office could genuinely make life easier.
The family has direct business investments, adult children and serious charitable goals.
Likely answer: strong case for professional family-office support, but not necessarily a large private office.
Several generations may benefit, there are homes in different countries and direct business investments.
Likely answer: a dedicated single-family office is now a serious option.
One main home, travel, cars and a professionally managed portfolio. No business empire and little family administration.
Likely answer: they may still prefer an outsourced or multi-family office. Having enough money to build one does not mean you need one.
This is why the amount of investable wealth matters.
EY says a stand-alone full-service single-family office can cost roughly US$500,000 to US$3m or more each year.
UBS's 2025 research projected pure operating cost at about 41.8 basis points for offices managing US$100m–US$250m. At US$100m, that is roughly US$418,000 before separate asset-management, banking and external-structure costs.
UBS found staff represented 67% of projected pure family-office operating costs in 2025.
A family office may coordinate a trust, but it does not make it tax-free. Many relevant-property trusts can face entry/exit charges and ten-year charges of up to 6% under current IHT rules.
A family investment company is a company, not a family office. The current UK Corporation Tax main rate is 25% for profits above the main-rate threshold.
The words “family office” do not prove that investment advice or management is FCA-authorised. Check the actual firm and legal entity providing regulated services.
Wealth ranges are shown as guides rather than rules because published family-office benchmarks differ by service model, country and family complexity.
