People Pay to Participate
Payment is one of the central tests. That is why a genuine free entry route can change the legal position of a commercial draw.
A lottery, a prize draw, a raffle and a competition can look almost identical on your phone — pay a small amount, pick some entries and hope to win a car, house or cash. Legally, though, the way you enter and the way the winner is chosen can make them very different.
The name used in an advert is not enough. The useful questions are: must you pay, is the result decided by chance, is there a genuine free route, and does skill actually affect who can win?
| Format | Do you have to pay? | How is the prize decided? | Main UK legal route | Can it be run for commercial gain? | Typical example |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lottery | Yes | Wholly by chance, or by a process beginning wholly by chance | National Lottery legislation, licensed/registered society lottery or lawful exempt lottery | Ordinary commercial lotteries for private gain are not generally permitted | National Lottery; licensed charity/society lottery |
| Free prize draw | No purchase must be necessary; a paid route can exist alongside a genuine free route | Chance | Outside lottery licensing if the free-entry requirements are properly met | Yes | Many house, car and cash draw sites |
| Prize competition | Can charge | Skill, knowledge or judgement must meet the legal test | Outside lottery licensing if the competition genuinely satisfies the skill test | Yes | A sufficiently demanding skill contest; judged Spot the Ball is one current commercial example |
| Paid chance-only social-media raffle | Yes | Chance | May be an illegal lottery if no lawful lottery or free-draw route applies | Not lawfully as a simple private-profit lottery | Some informal Facebook/TikTok/Instagram raffles |
The Gambling Act definition is built around three basic ingredients: people pay to take part, prizes are offered, and those prizes are allocated wholly by chance — or through a series of processes where the first process relies wholly on chance.
Payment is one of the central tests. That is why a genuine free entry route can change the legal position of a commercial draw.
The prize could be cash, a house, a vehicle, goods or another benefit. The label attached to the promotion does not change this part of the test.
If the prize is allocated wholly by chance, the arrangement can fall within the lottery definition unless another lawful structure applies.
A free draw can still look very similar to a paid competition site. The important point is that participants must have a genuine way to take part without paying more than the normal cost of communication.
A website can sell entries while also accepting a lawful free route, commonly by ordinary first- or second-class post.
It cannot exist only in theory. It should be available on workable terms and promoted so potential entrants can reasonably find it.
The system deciding the prize should not favour paid entries over qualifying free entries.
Unlike an ordinary paid lottery, a qualifying commercial free draw can be run for private or commercial gain.
For many chance-based commercial draws, the postal route is part of the structure that keeps the promotion outside the definition of a paid lottery. It is not simply a promotional bonus.
Check the draw page and terms for the address, wording, account details and closing date.
Many operators require an unenclosed postcard or one entry per envelope, plus specific contact and competition details.
The postal cut-off can differ from the online purchase deadline. Posting something on the final day may be too late.
Some operators add the entry to an account or issue a ticket number; others explain processing differently in their rules.
Current UK rules state that no purchase is necessary and eligible postal entries have the same chance as individual paid entries. One eligible entry is credited per outer mailing envelope or postcard.
Current terms say qualifying postal entries have the same chance per entry as paid online entries, with each postal entry sent separately.
Current draw pages visibly show an online-entry option and a free postal-entry route, with separate postcards required for multiple free entries.
A prize competition can charge for entry without becoming a lottery if the outcome genuinely depends on skill, knowledge or judgement at the level required by law.
The Gambling Commission says a simple multiple-choice question will not normally satisfy the test if almost everyone can answer it correctly.
The skill, knowledge or judgement should deter a significant proportion of potential entrants or prevent a significant proportion from winning.
BOTB currently uses judged Spot the Ball for its Dream Car competition. Entrants choose coordinates and an independent judging panel determines the target position.
The table is illustrative rather than a permanent legal label. Operators can run more than one product type, so always check the rules for the exact draw you are entering.
| Operator / product | Current example of format | What the current material shows | 2026 DCMS Code status | Read more |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| The National Lottery | Licensed lottery | Allwyn operates under the Fourth National Lottery Licence and individual game licences. | Not the voluntary prize-draw-code model | UK lottery guides |
| Omaze UK | Free prize draw | Paid entry plus postal alternate method; current rules say eligible entries have equal chances. | Current DCMS operator signatory — checked 27 September 2026 | What is Omaze UK? |
| BOTB | Mixed formats | Current products include judged Spot the Ball, skill-based competitions and free-entry competitions. | Current DCMS operator signatory — checked 27 September 2026 | Competition-site checks |
| Rev Comps | Commercial prize draws | Current DCMS code signatory; check each live promotion's entry and prize terms. | Current DCMS operator signatory — checked 27 September 2026 | Operator comparison |
| Dream Car Giveaways | Commercial prize draws | Current pages show online and free postal entry; examples advertise fixed closing dates and draws proceeding regardless of sales. | Current DCMS operator signatory — checked 27 September 2026 | Operator comparison |
| Elite Competitions | Commercial prize draws | Current terms provide postal entry and state equal chance per entry for postal and online entries. | Current DCMS operator signatory — checked 27 September 2026 | Operator comparison |
| McKinney Competitions | Commercial prize draws | Current draw pages publish ticket caps, ticket price, percentage sold and a free postal route. | Current DCMS operator signatory — checked 27 September 2026 | Operator comparison |
| 7 Days Performance | Prize draws / instant reveal | Current products include postal-entry routes and instant-reveal mechanics with the outcome generated separately from the visual reveal animation. | Current DCMS operator signatory — checked 27 September 2026 | Operator comparison |
Not in the same way as the National Lottery or licensed gambling products. Lawful free draws and genuine prize competitions sit outside lottery licensing because they meet legal exemption tests.
Licensed and regulated by the Gambling Commission under the National Lottery statutory framework.
Large society lotteries require a Gambling Commission operating licence; small society lotteries can require local-authority registration.
Do not require a gambling licence merely because prizes are allocated by chance, provided the free-entry structure meets the legal requirements.
Can operate outside lottery licensing where the skill, knowledge or judgement test is genuinely met.
The Government published the code in November 2025 and existing signatories were expected to implement it fully by 20 May 2026. It focuses on player protection, transparency and accountability.
Signatories should be 18+, use reasonable age verification and provide overall spend controls or player-set monthly limits.
The code sets a £250 monthly credit-card limit per player and says credit cards should not be accepted at all for instant-win prize draws.
The free route should be clearly and prominently available before purchase and allow enough time for entries to be received and processed.
Operators should explain how winners are selected and, where possible, provide useful information about likelihood of winning.
Signatories should not lower the prize, postpone the draw or cancel because sales were weaker than expected.
The code calls for independent selection/supervision unless a verifiably random auditable computer process or certified physical machine is used.
Players should be able to suspend an account for at least six months or close it permanently, with marketing stopped during suspension.
Where charitable giving is part of the promotion, the parameters and, where possible, the amounts and frequency should be transparent.
No. The ticket price is only the price of an entry. To understand the chance of winning, you need to know how many valid entries can go into the draw and how many entries you hold.
One entry against a full 10,000-entry pool would be approximately 1 in 10,000 for one equally weighted end prize.
One entry against a full one-million-entry pool would be approximately 1 in 1,000,000 for one equally weighted end prize.
Ten entries in a 10,000-entry final pool would be approximately 1 in 1,000, assuming all entries are equally weighted and there is one relevant prize.
Convert an entry pool into a plain-English chance for a simple random draw with one relevant prize.
This is deliberately simple. It assumes one relevant prize, a final pool of equally weighted valid entries and no special mechanics. Maximum-ticket figures show the worst-case pool only if every available entry is ultimately valid and included. Multiple prizes, instant wins, bonus draws, subscriptions, free-entry multipliers or other mechanics need separate calculations.
This used to be one of the biggest areas of confusion because different promotions used different fallback rules. The 2026 voluntary code now sets a clearer expectation for signatories.
The code says signatories should not change the end date or cancel a draw because ticket sales are low.
The advertised prize should be awarded, or a reasonable cash alternative provided in line with the code and promotion terms.
General operator terms are not enough. Check the specific draw page for closing date, maximum entries, prize wording and any stated cash alternative.
For chance-based draws, the important question is not whether a live video looks exciting. It is whether the selection process is fair, auditable and consistent with the published rules.
An independent person can conduct or supervise the winner selection.
The 2026 code allows a computer process where the results are verifiably random and auditable.
A certified physical machine can also be used under the code.
The operator should tell entrants how its draw is actually conducted rather than leaving the process vague.
Only if the terms provide for it, or a reasonable equivalent is offered where the original prize cannot be supplied. Do not assume every house, car or watch automatically comes with a cash option.
Where a cash alternative is shown before entry, check the exact figure and whether choosing cash affects any other part of the prize package.
ASA guidance says an alternative prize should normally be similar in nature and value to what was advertised.
Cars, watches and other goods can have a retail price that differs from their resale value. Read the stated cash-alternative terms rather than estimating it yourself.
Repeat winners create a lot of suspicion on Reddit and car forums, but repetition alone does not prove a draw is rigged.
Someone entering several draws every week has many more opportunities to appear on a winners list than someone entering once a year.
If a promotion permits hundreds of entries per person, regular high-volume entrants can represent a larger share of the entry pool.
Useful checks are the entry cap, individual entry limit, auditable selection process, winners history and evidence that prizes are actually awarded.
Yes. Instead of waiting for one closing-date draw, an instant-win product can allocate a winning or losing outcome when an entry is processed.
Some current operators state that the outcome is generated or predetermined separately and the wheel, card or animation is only the reveal.
Check how many prizes exist, whether the pool is fixed or unlimited, whether prizes can already have been won and whether an end prize also exists.
The 2026 voluntary code says signatories should not accept credit-card payments at all for instant-win prize draws.
No single badge or review score proves that every promotion is suitable. Check the actual draw in front of you.
Reddit, MoneySavingExpert-style comping communities and specialist competition forums repeatedly raise the same practical questions. MLL has used those questions to shape this guide, while factual answers come from official rules and operator terms.
Look for completed draws, winner histories, selection method and evidence of prize fulfilment rather than relying only on social comments.
Check the operator's processing rules and deadlines. A lawful free draw should not give a qualifying paid entry better odds than a qualifying free entry.
No. Compare entry pool and prize structure, not ticket price alone.
Frequency and entry volume matter. Investigate the draw process before treating repeat names as evidence of wrongdoing.
Check companies, free-entry routes, winners, current DCMS signatory status and warning signs.
OmazeHow Omaze works, postal entry, house draws, charity links and winner questions.
Alternatives hubExplore the wider landscape of commercial draws, charity lotteries and other alternatives.
SafetyCheck a lottery, raffle or draw before sending money or card details.
Plain-English answers to the questions people repeatedly ask about UK lotteries, postal entry, competition sites, odds and online raffles.
Legal and regulatory claims are based primarily on Gambling Commission, DCMS and ASA/CAP material. Operator examples were checked against current official pages or terms. Community discussions were used to identify recurring user questions, not to establish allegations as fact.
Are Social-Media Raffles Legal in the UK?
Some promotions on social media are lawful, but a paid chance-only raffle run online for private or commercial gain can be an illegal lottery if it does not have the required lawful structure.
A Professional Page Is Not Proof of Legality
Gambling Commission research found consumers often rely on visible winners, familiar hosts, comments and a polished presentation rather than formal checks.
The Label Can Be Misleading
Hosts use words such as raffle, competition, lottery, tombola and giveaway inconsistently. The mechanics determine the legal position.
Low Ticket Prices Can Reduce Scrutiny
The Commission found that low-cost, mobile-first participation can feel casual and low risk, making people less likely to question legality.
The Entrant Is Not the Person Breaking the Lottery Law
The Commission's 2026 research makes clear that the potential illegality concerns the host running the unlicensed lottery, not the consumer who entered it.